Audience

Arab-American Media

At a time of major news developments in the Middle East and North Africa, the Arab-American media’s efforts to meet the demands of its audience have been complicated by declining ad revenue, new technology, and growing competition from Arab outlets in the Middle East and North Africa, according to a new PEJ study.

  

Summary of Findings

In January, 2011 the Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism and Internet & American Life Project, in partnership with the Knight Foundation, conducted a nationally representative telephone survey of U.S. adults exploring local news consumption habits. Overall, the survey indicated that most adults follow what is happening in their local communities and that the local news ecosystem is complex.  Rather than relying on one or two main sources of local news, most adults use a wide variety of both traditional and online sources depending on which local topic they are seeking information about.[1] 

This report reexamines those data with an eye toward how local news consumption practices vary by community type.  Specifically, it focuses on the ways residents in large cities, suburbs, small towns and rural areas compare in their levels of interest in local news, the topics they are most interested in, and the sources they rely on to learn about those topics.  

The results indicate that from large urban areas to rural communities, Americans often report similarly high levels of interest in news in general, in local news and information, and in national and international news.  Moreover, similar percentages of adults report following the specific local topics asked about, regardless of the type of community in which they live.

Still, community differences do emerge in the number and variety of local news sources used, as well as the degree of "local news participation" and mobile news consumption.  Many of the differences in local news consumption emerging from these data reflect the varying demographic composition of different community types in the U.S.

Some of the main differences include:

Urban residents: People who live in large cities rely on a wider combination of platforms for information than others and are more likely to get local news and information via a range of digital activities, including internet searches, Twitter, blogs and the websites of local TV stations and newspapers. Urbanites were also those least tied to their communities in terms of how long they lived in the community and how many people they know. They were the least interested of all groups in information about local taxes. At the same time, those who live in large cities, along with suburban residents, are the most likely to be digital "news participators" who email local stories to others, post material on social networking sites, comment on news stories online, or contribute to online discussions on message boards.  Also along with suburbanites, they are more likely to get news via mobile devices.
Additionally, they are the most likely to rely on local TV news for information about breaking news, weather, crime, politics, and traffic.

Suburban residents: Those who live in suburban communities are more likely than others to rely on local radio as a platform (perhaps because of relatively longer commuting times); they are more interested than others in news and information about arts and cultural events; and they are particularly interested in local restaurants, traffic, and taxes. Like urbanites, they are heavy digital participators who comment and share the news. These suburban residents rely mainly on the internet for information about local restaurants, businesses, and jobs. They look to television news for weather and breaking news. 

Small town residents:  Along with rural residents, people who live in smaller towns are more likely to rely on traditional news platforms such as television and newspapers to get local news; newspapers are especially important to them for civic information. Small town Americans prefer the local newspaper for a long list of information-including local weather, crime, community events, schools, arts and culture, taxes, housing, zoning, local government and social services. Residents of smaller towns are also the most likely to worry about what would happen if the local newspaper no longer existed.            

Rural residents: Those who live in rural communities generally are less interested in almost all local topics than those in other communities. The one exception is taxes. They are also more reliant on traditional platforms such as newspapers and TV for most of the topics we queried. And they are less likely than others to say it is easier now to keep up with local information.

It is important to note that the choices about information acquisition are not necessarily the same in all communities. For instance, it might be the case in rural areas that the local newspaper and broadcast outlets are not online or have a very limited online presence and that is a determinant in whether residents get local information online or not. Our survey asked what consumers do in terms of information acquisition and what sources they "rely on." It did not ask what they could do-that is, what information and sources are available in their communities. In many respects- but not all respects- people generally want similar types of news and information. In some communities, they have many choices and are quite deliberate in which platform they use to get which kind of information. In other communities, they have fewer choices.

Across the four community types, residents report similarly high levels of general interest in news, attention to local news, and interest in most specific local topics

The percentage of Americans who indicate they enjoy keeping up with the news 'a lot' ranges from 53% to 60% across the four community types, and similar percentages follow international news closely regardless of what is happening (ranging from 54% to 58%).  More residents in all community types follow local news this closely, with percentages ranging from 68% in large cities to 73% in rural areas.  Interest in national news is highest among suburban residents, with three quarters (74%) following closely regardless of what is going on, compared with two-thirds (67%) of residents of other types of communities.

Across the four community types, residents also report similarly high levels of interest in most of the 16 specific local topics asked about

The survey asked a nationally representative sample of adults whether they ever get news and information about 16 different local topics.

For 11 of 16 local topics that we queried, there are no statistically significant differences in interest level across residents of different community types.  The five local topics for which interest levels differ are arts and culture, restaurants, traffic, taxes, and housing.  Residents of suburban communities show the highest interest level in all five of these topics, while rural residents show the lowest interest level on all but taxes.  In the case of taxes and tax issues, residents of large cities are the least likely to say they follow the topic.

Residents of different community types differ in the sources they rely on for their local news

Residents of large cities, who on the whole skew younger and are more mobile than populations living in other community types, are most likely to stay informed about local topics that interest them through a combination of online and traditional sources. They are particularly likely to get local news through internet searches, Twitter, blogs, and websites of TV and newspapers.  In contrast, small city (31%) and rural (34%) residents are more likely than those in larger cities (21%) and suburbs (16%) to rely solely on "traditional" forms of media for their local news such as local print newspapers and broadcast television. 

Suburban residents are distinct in their higher dependence on local radio (likely due to longer commutes to work), while small city and rural residents stand out in their reliance on word of mouth for some types of local information.

Urban and suburban residents on average use more sources of local news than their small town and rural counterparts and are more likely to consume local news on mobile devices

In an average week, residents of large cities and suburbs use more sources of local information than others.  On average, residents of large cities and suburbs use just under four sources per week (3.63 and 3.72, respectively) compared to those in small cities or towns and rural areas who use closer to three sources per week (3.31 and 3.28, respectively).  In addition, more than half of urban (53%) and suburban (57%) residents get some kind of local news or information via cell phone or tablet computer compared with 45% of small city and 35% of rural residents. 

The most active "local news participators" also tend to reside in suburban and urban communities

Suburban residents are more likely than any of the other groups (53% vs. 45% large city, 36% small city, 32% rural) to actively participate in local news and large city residents are more likely than small city or rural residents to be classified as local news participators, meaning they email local stories to others, post news or information about the local community on social networking sites or Twitter, comment on local stories they read online, contribute to online discussions on message boards about the local community, and the like.  

Rural residents are the least likely to say it is "easier" to keep up with local news and information today than it was five years ago

Residents of large cities (59%), suburbs (60%) and small towns (55%) are more likely than those in rural communities (46%) to say it is "easier" to keep up with local news and information today than it was five years ago.   Yet at the same time, residents of large cities are the least willing to pay for local news content through a paid subscription to a local newspaper (22% vs. 40% suburbs, 33% small towns, 37% rural). 

These are just some of the findings about Americans from different communities as identified in a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism and Internet & American Life Project, in partnership with the Knight Foundation.  The nationally representative phone survey of 2,251 adults ages 18 and older was conducted January 12-25, 2011 and included 750 cell phone interviews.

Read the complete report.

Footnote:

[1] See "How People Learn About Their Local Community," available at http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Local-news.aspx

 Print     E-mail

39% -- Percentage of the Twitter conversation offering positive reviews of the Olympic opening ceremonies. 

The elaborate London Olympics opening ceremony-which featured everything from flying Mary Poppinses to a squeaking Paul McCartney-had its fair share of critics and fans when it aired on July 27. And while there was more applause than criticism of the event, the show was something less than a smash hit in the Twitterverse.

Almost four out of ten assertions on Twitter (39%) on the day of the event and the following day were positive, according to a study conducted by the Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism.  PEJ examined more than 2.5 million opinions about the ceremony-drawing from all public Tweets in English-using technology from the firm Crimson Hexagon.

Words like "Awesome!" "Amazing!" and "Brilliant!" were commonly thrown around, and many users were fond of film director Danny Boyle's work directing the grand show.

"Brilliant opening ceremony! Credit to Danny Boyle! Genius bringing Bond and Queen together :-) #London2012," wrote @MediaworksIre.

About a third, 31%, of the discussion was neutral in nature, with many of them simply news accounts of the event.

Another third, 30%, of the Twitter conversation about the ceremony featured less flattering assessments. That included 12% featuring outright negative reviews, another 11% expressing confusion about the highly staged spectacle and 7% criticizing host network NBC, primarily for failing to broadcast the events live. (London is five hours ahead the East Coast of the U.S.)

Some of the negative reviewers made unfavorable comparisons with the opening ceremonies at the 2008 Beijing Olympics. "Eurosport just reminding us how incredible the Beijing opening ceremony was... time to step up London!" wrote @PPaudioteam.

Speaking for those who were confounded by the opening show, @mikeminer  wrote, "Is anyone else baffled by the opening ceremonies? It's not about good or bad, I'm just really confused."

And among NBC's critics, @DaveMacMS wrote: "It's pathetic that @NBC - provider of Olympic vision to the world's TV networks-refuses to show the opening ceremony live in the US."

By Emily Guskin

Most adults follow local news closely, relying on local newspapers and other sources

Nearly three quarters (72%) of adults are quite attached to following local news and information, and local newspapers are by far the source they rely on for much of the local information they need.  In fact, local news enthusiasts are substantially more wedded to their local newspapers than others. They are much more likely than others to say that if their local newspaper vanished, it would have a major impact on their ability to get the local information they want.  This is especially true of local news followers age 40 and older, who differ from younger local news enthusiasts in some key ways. 

One-third of local news enthusiasts (32%) say it would have a major impact on them if their local newspaper no longer existed, compared with just 19% of those less interested in local news.  Most likely to report a major impact if their newspaper disappeared are local news followers age 40 and older (35%), though even among younger local news followers 26% say losing the local paper would have a major impact on them.  In contrast, just 19% of adults who do not follow local news closely say they would feel a major impact and fully half (51%) say they would feel no impact at all from the loss of their local paper. Only 34% of local news enthusiasts feel this way. 

These local news and information consumers stand out from other adults in several respects related to community attachment, general interest in all types of news, use of sources for local news and information, and the particular topics of interest to them on the local scene. 

As a whole, local news enthusiasts do not stand out from other adults in their use of technology or in the way they use technology to participate in local affairs, such as sending around links or posting comments on websites.  However, among local news enthusiasts there are considerable differences in technology use across generations.  

These are among the main findings in a nationally representative phone survey of 2,251 adults by the Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism and Internet & American Life Project, produced in association with the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. It focused on the ways people get information and news about 16 different topics, ranging from breaking news to weather to crime to schools information. The survey was administered from January 12-25, 2011 on landline and cell phones. It has an overall margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points.

And here are some of the main findings, as they apply to the group who identified themselves as local news enthusiasts:

Local news enthusiasts are more connected to their community

Adults who follow local news closely are fairly diverse in their age, though they skew older, more female, and more African-American as a group when compared with adults who do not follow local news as closely.  They are also more likely to describe themselves as politically conservative and to attend religious services on a weekly basis when compared with those who are not consistent local news consumers. 

Local news consumers are more connected to their communities than others, both in length of time in the community and in their connection with neighbors, and more likely to think they can improve their communities.  Roughly three in 10 have lived in their community 20 years or longer (32% vs. 20% of others), and thus not surprisingly are more likely to know all of their neighbors.  This is driven largely by local news enthusiasts age 40 and older.  As a whole, local news enthusiasts are also slightly more likely than other adults to believe they can have a big impact on making their community a better place to live. 

Local news enthusiasts' news consumption habits differ from other adults

In addition to local news, this group is more actively engaged than others in following news in general, and international and national news specifically.  Sixty-three percent enjoy keeping up with news "a lot" compared with 35% of other adults.  This is especially true of older local news enthusiasts (age 40 and older), 72% of whom say they enjoy keeping up with new "a lot." 

Six in 10 local news followers (63%) also follow international news closely most of the time regardless of whether something is happening or not and 78% follow national news this closely.  In comparison, 39% of other adults follow international news this closely and 46% follow national news this closely. 

When it comes to sources of local news and information, 35% of local news enthusiasts say that local news sources give them all of the information that matters to them, 10 percentage points higher than those less interested in local news. They also use more sources of local news and information per week than others (mean of 3.77 vs. 2.84).  The youngest local news enthusiasts, those age 18-39, use the greatest number of local news sources weekly, with a mean of 4.38. 

Local news enthusiasts are interested in many local topics.  This group is more likely than other adults to follow 12 out of 16 local news topics asked about - including weather, breaking news, politics, crime and schools/education.  In many cases, interest in particular topics is driven by older local news enthusiasts (weather, politics, crime, traffic, taxes, and local government activity, social services and zoning), while interest in other topics lies mainly with younger local news followers (job openings, restaurants).

For 14 of these 16 topics, the local newspaper is local news enthusiasts' preferred source of information (or tied at the top with another source).  Overall, local television news is the preferred source for just four topics, while the internet is preferred for just three of the 16 asked about. 

While this seems to be positive news for newspapers, in many cases the reliance on newspapers is heaviest among older local news enthusiasts, while younger local news followers rely more heavily on other sources. 

READ THE COMPLETE REPORT.

 Print     E-mail

6% - Univision’s increase in audience (18-49) in 2011—the only top-five network to see growth for the year

On January 23rd NewsCorp announced a new Spanish-language broadcast network, MundoFox, to debut this fall. In doing so, it enters the growing market for Spanish-speaking viewers. Univision, the number one Spanish language network, will be adding to its arsenal as well. The company recently signed its first affiliate deal for three new channels on Dish Network—including a 24 hour news channel—which are scheduled to go live in this spring.

Spanish language television, and particularly Univision, has seen tremendous growth over the last several years, and now competes in many timeslots with the major English-language networks.

In 2011, indeed, Univision was the only top-five network to see an overall increase in audience.  The channel’s adult audience (18-49) grew 6% from its 2010 numbers (and grew 8% in prime time). By contrast, ABC (-8%), CBS (-8%), NBC (-10%) and Fox (-6%) all saw declines in overall audience. Telemundo, the second largest Spanish-language station in the U.S. trails far behind Univision, but it, too, had record breaking 2010-2011 broadcast season. The network averaged more total viewers in prime time than it ever had before. During its Monday-Friday primetime, it had an average of 662,000 viewers among adults 18-49, an increase of 9% from the season before. Read more about PEJ’s research on Hispanic Media

With more than 50 million Latinos viewers in the U.S., a number that is expected to rise further in coming years, these companies are banking on strong showings for their networks. 

 

 

 

Read the Hispanic section, the newest edition to the Ethnic chapter of the State of the News Media 2011 report.

 

 

 

 

 Printer-Friendly     E-mail   

Navigating News Online

The future of the journalism relies heavily on understanding the ways people consume news online. But mastering that information is challenging. Behavior is changing quickly, and the metrics can be elusive and even contradictory. In a new study, PEJ examines Nielsen data from the top 25 most popular news sites to offer insights about how people get to news sites; what they do once there and where they go when they leave.

 Print     E-mail

#16 - Number of top 20 newspapers (by market penetration) that lost overall audience in 2010

Newspaper companies frequently claim that between their print subscribers and online audience, they are attracting more readers than ever before. But that may not have been the case last year.

Indeed, new figures from Scarborough Research obtained by the Poynter Institute’s Rick Edmonds show audience reach across the two platforms dropping in 2010 for many papers that boast the most loyal readership in the country.

Of the top 20 U.S. newspapers in terms of market penetration—the percentage of adults in a metro region reading the paper in print or online or both—16 dailies actually saw a decline in penetration from 2009 to 2010. Only three saw their overall reach increase.[1]

Many of the market penetration declines were modest, but among those suffering the biggest losses in 2010 were the Des Moines Register (-11.3%), the Louisville Courier-Journal (-9.4%) and the Austin American-Statesman (-8.2%).

The three newspapers that grew their percentage of market reach for the year were Gannett’s Wisconsin papers (68% to 69%), the New Orleans Times-Picayune (66% to 68%) and Tulsa World (51% to 53%). [2]

When looking at the top newspapers by market penetration, the No. 1 publication is the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle, which was read by 72% of adults in the Rochester metro region. Second was a combination of Gannett’s newspapers in Wisconsin at 69% followed by the New Orleans times-Picayune at 68%. The rest of the chart can be seen here.

This list of market penetration leaders differs significantly from the 20 newspapers with the largest combined print and online readership. Only one newspaper made both lists: The Washington Post, with 60% market penetration and a combined readership of 2,836,127.  As Edmonds points out, the highest penetration papers tend to be in compact metro areas rather than sprawling ones that often have competing suburban dailies.

Still, a vast majority of papers on both lists lost combined readers between 2009 and 2010 –more bad news for an industry already reeling from continuing revenue declines last year.

Emily Guskin of PEJ


Footnotes:

1.The Scarborough surveys for each year are conducted on a rotating basis so the figures are from different times over the course of the year.

2. Gannett Wisconsin Papers include Appleton Post-Crescent, Fond du Lac Reporter, Green Bay Press-Gazette, Manitowoc Herald Times Reporter, Oshkosh Northwester and their websites.