Covering the Great Recession

The Lead Teaser: 

The economic downturn has made headlines for months. How has the press covered the gravest financial crisis since the Great Depression? What elements of the economic story make the most news? Who is driving the coverage? PEJ addresses these questions and more in a new report on press coverage of the economy.

How the Media Have Depicted the Economic Crisis During Obama’s Presidency

The gravest economic crisis since the Great Depression has been covered in the media largely from the top down, told primarily from the perspective of the Obama Administration and big business, and reflected the voices and ideas of people in institutions more than those of everyday Americans, according to a new study by Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism.

Citizens may be the primary victims of the downturn, but they have not been not the primary actors in the media depiction of it.

A PEJ content analysis of media coverage of the economy during the first half of 2009 also found that the mainstream press focused on a relatively small number of major story lines, mostly generating from two cities, the country’s political and financial capitals.

A companion analysis of a broader  array of media using new “meme tracker” technology developed at Cornell University finds that phrases and ideas that reverberated most in the coverage came early on, mostly from government, particularly from the president and the chairman of the Federal Reserve, and that few Republicans in Congress articulated any memes that got much traction.

As the story moved away from Washington—and the news about the economy seemed to improve—the amount of coverage of the economy also dropped off substantially.

These are a few of the findings from the comprehensive study of media coverage of the economy since Obama took office.  

The PEJ report is comprised of three different analyses of the media’s economic coverage. The basic narrative of the coverage was studied from February 1 through August 31, an analysis of about 9,950 stories from television, radio, cable, newspapers and online. A more detailed analysis of the sourcing in stories, the datelines, the events that triggered each story and the differences between media sectors was conducted for a shorter period, from February 1 through July 3. The third element, an examination of the precise phrases and ideas that resonated most fully in the media was conducted in collaboration with researchers at Cornell University and Stanford University. This third element included an even larger universe of media – millions of different web-based outlets, including mainstream news sites, new media sites and blog RSS feeds.

Among the findings:

Related Article Links: 
<p> <a href="/node/12377" target="_blank">Tracking the Economic Slow Down</a> </p> <p> <a href="/numbers_report/clunkers_make_good_copy" target="_blank">Clunkers Make Good Copy</a> </p> <p> <a href="/numbers_report/most_newsworthy_moments_financial_meltdown" target="_blank">Most Newsworthy Moments of the Financial Meltdown</a> </p> <p> <a href="/node/13371" target="_blank">The Meltdown and the Media</a> </p> <p> <a href="/node/14081" target="_blank">The X-Mas Retail Story – Bah Humbug</a> </p> <p> <a href="/numbers_report/detroit%E2%80%99s_troubles_make_big_news%E2%80%A6sometimes" target="_blank">Detroit’s Troubles Make Big News – Sometimes</a> </p>