A Continuum of Condemning the PressAs election day draws closer, complaints about a liberal bias in the press have intensified. On Oct. 6, a crowd at a Sarah Palin rally shouted abuse at reporters after the vice presidential nominee blamed CBS anchor Katie Couric for what Palin called a "less-than-successful interview with the kinda mainstream media." Wall Street Journal columnist Dorothy Rabinowitz has offered concrete examples of reporting that favored Obama. And probably the most strident moment came from McCain senior advisor Steve Schmidt who in September told reporters that the New York Times “is today not by any standard a journalistic organization.” Where do the current criticisms fit in with the history of national political leaders' relations with the press? Criticism of the press by political figures is hardly new. As far back as 1796, George Washington explained his decision not to seek a third term noting, among other reasons, he was “disinclined to be longer buffeted in the public prints by a set of infamous scribblers.” [1]
The criticism has not always come from the political right. During the Viet Nam War, Presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon alike condemned the press for what they saw as undermining of their war efforts. Bill Clinton’s relationship with the press, never good, soured further during the scandal over Monica Lewinsky, and variously included complaints about both liberalism and a right-wing media machine.
The more overtly partisan and ideological nature of the criticism—that the press is liberal—is relatively new. The modern critique by conservatives that the press is liberal first notably flowered in public in 1964 when former President Dwight Eisenhower raised the complaint at the Republican convention, to wild reaction. The criticism has become noticeably bolder since the 1990s, when Newt Gingrich, representing the second generation of movement conservatism, took power in the House. Yet it may have never been more pointed or personal than this year.
“The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers.”[2]
“I am so accustomed to having everything reported erroneously that I have almost come to the point of believing nothing that I see in the newspapers.” [3]
“You won’t have Nixon to kick around anymore, because, gentlemen, this is my last press conference ... I hope that the press … recognize that they have a right and a responsibility, if they’re against a candidate, give him the shaft, but also recognize if they give him the shaft, put one lonely reporter on the campaign who will report what the candidate says now and then.” [4]
“Let us particularly scorn the divisive efforts of those outside our family, including sensation-seeking columnists and commentators, because I assure you that these are people who couldn’t care less about the good of our party.” [5] Though at times Lyndon Johnson privately admitted the Viet Nam War was unwinnable, he also privately complained about coverage of the conflict in the press, particularly the New York Times, which he said was undermining public confidence in the administration. He said the people in charge of the newspaper were:
The critique against the press took on new velocity on November 13, 1969, when Vice President Spiro Agnew, in a speech written by William Safire and Pat Buchanan, condemned the phenomenon of “instant analysis” on television, after a critical reaction to a nationally televised speech by Richard Nixon. While the speech was considered striking at the time, the tone seems reserved compared with what one might find today.
The three journalists on the original list were Ed Guthman, Los Angeles Times, Daniel Schorr, CBS, and Mary McGrory, Washington Post columnist. [8] In the fall of 1992, as he trailed in the polls in the presidential campaign, President George H.W. Bush produced an anti-media slogan, which the President would mention from the stump:
"Annoy the Media: Re-elect Bush."
"I have fought more damn battles here for more things than any President has in twenty years, with the possible exception of Reagan's first budget, and not gotten one damn bit of credit from the knee-jerk liberal press, and I am sick and tired of it, and you can put that in your damn article."
“The great story here for anybody willing to find it and write about it and explain it is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president.”
“I unequivocally believe as a Republican activist that the core of the news media is biased, that the bias is amazing.” [9]
“I glance at the headlines just to get a kind of a flavor for what's moving. I rarely read the stories ... The best way to get the news is from objective sources. And the most objective sources I have are people on my staff who tell me what's happening in the world.” [10]
“The media is a failing institution in this country. They are not maintaining their responsibility to maintain democracy.” [11]
“The people of South Carolina are coming to these meetings and asking questions about what they care about. And what they care about is not going to be in the news coverage tonight because you don't care about it. What you care about is this, [whether Bill Clinton is playing the race card against Barack Obama]. And the Obama people know that. So they just spin you up on this and you happily go along.
“Well, can I just point out that in the last several debates, I seem to get the first question all the time. And I don't mind. I — you know, I'll be happy to field them, but I do find it curious, and if anybody saw "Saturday Night Live," you know, maybe we should ask Barack if he's comfortable and needs another pillow.”
“But here's a little news flash for all those reporters and commentators: I’m not going to Washington to seek their good opinion - I'm going to Washington to serve the people of this country. Americans expect us to go to Washington for the right reasons, and not just to mingle with the right people.”
“Whatever the New York Times once was, it is today not by any standard a journalistic organization. This is an organization that is completely, totally, 150 percent in the tank for the Democratic candidate, which is their prerogative to be. Everything that is read in The New York Times that attacks this campaign should be evaluated by the American people from that perspective.” [12] FOOTNOTE
1. George Washington was speaking to his VP John Adams in 1796, explaining his disinterest in a third term. Quotation is taken from Brian J. Buchanan, “Sex and politics as news is hardly new,” First Amendment Center Online, October 20, 2006, http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=17558
|
|
|