2004 Presidential Election Coverage
November 5, 2004
Note: This archive includes stories published since Labor Day. Some of the articles below may no longer be available for free, but can be accessed usually for a fee or by using a database such as LexisNexis. Return to the Daily Briefing October 30 through November 5 "A few simple tips for the media to get it right next time"
Kay McFadden, The Seattle Times, November 4, 2004 | | | "Bloggers' exit-poll data misled people, news outlets say"
David Bauder, Associated Press, November 4, 2004 | | | "Exit polls bring traffic deluge, scrutiny, to blogs, Slate"
Marc Glaser, Online Journalism Review, November 5, 2004 | | | "The passion that burned for Bush"
Jon Friedman, CBS MarketWatch.com, November 4, 2004 | | | "Keyes blames media, GOP for loss"
Associated Press, November 5, 2004 | | | "Early missteps, late-night caution-- but the right call"
Mark Jurkowitz, The Boston Globe, November 4, 2004 | | | "Once bitten, twice tempted, but no call in wee hours"
Jacques Steinberg and David Carr, The New York Times, November 4, 2004 | | | "Election Night coverage more cautious than in 2000"
Paul Janensch, The Hartford Courant, November 4, 2004 | | | "Cautious CBS tries to atone"
Chris Kaltenbach, The Baltimore Sun, November 3, 2004 | | | "Amazing loss"
Tim Graham, National Review, November 3, 2004 | | | "New woes surface in use of estimates"
Richard Morin, The Washington Post, November 4, 2004 | | | "TV's shrill voices drown out reason in race for president"
Michael Olesker, The Baltimore Sun, November 2, 2004 | | | | | "Coverage takes on the wait of responsibility"
Phil Rosenthal, Chicago Sun-Times, November 3, 2004 | | | "Anchors make call: caution carries the day"
Alessandra Stanley, The New York Times, November 3, 2004 | | | "Networks stay cautious but hint at outcome"
Mark Memmott and Martha T. Moore, USA Today, November 3, 2004 | | | "TV journalists stick to what they know"
Hal Boedeker, The Orlando Sentinel, November 3, 2004 | | | "News networks call election results with caution"
Nick Anderson and Elizabeth Jensen, The Los Angeles Times, November 3, 2004 | | | "Kill the messenger"
Bob Garfield, On the Media, October 29, 2004 | | | "Peter Jennings on covering Election Night"
Tavis Smiley, The Tavis Smiley Show, November 2, 2004 | | | | | "Networks wary of a rerun of 2000"
Melanie McFarland, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, November 2, 2004 | | | "Once-bitten networks vow not to make hasty calls"
Jim Rutenberg, The New York Times, November 2, 2004 | | | "Networks act to ensure accurate reports"
Hal Boedeker, The Orlando Sentinel, November 2, 2004 | | | "Cheney's core speech seems stale to some in local news"
Joel Brinkley, The New York Times, November 1, 2004 | | | "World's media descend on Tallahassee for election"
Gary Fineout, The Miami Herald, November 2, 2004 | | | "Media timing and the October surprise"
Jacques Steinberg and David Carr, The New York Times, November 1, 2004 | | | "Gun-shy TV anchors to use glitzy data blitz"
Mark Schwed, Palm Beach Post, November 1, 2004 | | | "'04 election has local roots"
Daisy Whitney, TV Week, November 1, 2004 | | | "Trying to avoid repeat of 2000 election"
David Zurawik, The Baltimore Sun, October 30, 2004 | | | "TV cautious about election coverage"
Rick Bird, The Cincinnati Post, November 1, 2004 | | | "TV networks to try new exit-poll policies"
Jennifer Ludden, All Things Considered (NPR), October 31, 2004 | | | "The campaign-coverage balance sheet: adding up the newspaper's numbers"
Greg Arrieta-Walden, The Oregonian, November 1, 2004 | | | "The remote vote: A cable news boost"
Laura Petrecca, The New York Post, November 1, 2004 | | | "Anti-Kerry film gets vast airing"
Elizabeth Jensen, The Los Angeles Times, November 1, 2004 | | October 23 through October 29 "Endorsements fire up readers"
Michelle Koidin Jaffee, San Antonio Express-News, October 29, 2004 | | | "Who's distorting events before election now?"
Jonah Goldberg, Tribune Media Services, October 29, 2004 | | | "Predicting a president: where the papers' online electoral maps agree and disagree"
Erin Olson, Editor & Publisher, October 28, 2004 | | | "Cable takes a stand, beyond the reach of reprisals"
Elizabeth Jensen, The Los Angeles Times, October 29, 2004 | | | "Misleading us to the end"
Molly Ivins, The Chicago Tribune, October 28, 2004 | | | "TV news casts vote for caution"
John Cook, The Chicago Tribune, October 28, 2004 | | | "If you're Kerry, you gotta love the coverage"
Tim Goodman, San Francisco Chronicle, October 27, 2004 | | | "The sunset of Big Media?"
Cal Thomas, Tribune Media Services, October 28, 2004 | | | "Media wary of new law limiting access to polls"
Gregg Aamot, Associated Press, October 27, 2004 | | | "Media-bias charges rally Republican base"
Greg Hitt, The Wall Street Journal, October 28, 2004 | | | "Of Armitages, Kennedys, political buttons, and more"
Jay Nordlinger, National Review, October 28, 2004 | | | | | "Kerry winning the battle over coverage, study says"
Mark Jurkowitz, The Boston Globe, October 27, 2004 | | | "As the debates went, so went coverage of the president"
Howard Kurtz, The Washington Post, October 27, 2004 | | | "Bush 'battered' by more critical press"
Jennifer Harper, The Washington Times, October 27, 2004 | | | "TV's argument shows get some comeuppance"
Clarence Page, Chicago Tribune, October 27, 2004 | | | "Lazy bums"
Ta-Nehisi Coates, The Village Voice, October 26, 2004 | | | "Entertainment and politics"
Cynthia Littleton, Backstage, October 27, 2004 | | | "Campaigns choosy about media for message"
Mark Memmott, USA Today, October 26, 2004 | | | "Old whines in barely new bottles"
Dana Milbank, The Washington Post, October 26, 2004 | | | "Cleveland 'Plain Dealer': between Bush and a hard place"
Shawn Moynihan, Editor & Publisher, October 26, 2004 | | | "Rupert Murdoch: Fox not biased for Bush"
Associated Press, October 26, 2004 | | | "Media have become the message in a bruising political year"
Peter Johnson, USA Today, October 25, 2004 | | | "And now a few words about our candidates"
Randy Kennedy, The New York Times, October 25, 2004 | | | "Networks taking steps to avoid a repeat of 2000 fiasco"
Jonathan Storm and Gail Shister, The Philadelphia Inquirer, October 24, 2004 | | | "The big winners"
Richard Viguerie and David Franke, The Washington Post, October 24, 2004 | | | "Sinclair airs show on Kerry"
Elizabeth Jensen, The Los Angeles Times, October 24, 2004 | | | "Two sides to every story"
Mark Jurkowitz, The Boston Globe, October 25, 2004 | | | "Who dominated this year's campaign coverage?"
Ed Bark, The Dallas Morning News, October 23, 2004 | | | "A polarized society leads to polarized journalism"
David Shaw, The Los Angeles Times, October 25, 2004 | | | | October 16 through October 22 The media for Kerry"
Diana West, The Washington Times, October 22, 2004 | | | "Kerry opts out of Sinclair program"
Doug Halonen, TV Week, October 21, 2004 | | | "Poll me do"
William Powers, National Journal, October 22, 2004 | | | "Why magazines should endorse candidates"
Jon Friedman, CBS MarketWatch, October 22, 2004 | | | "Anti-Bush effort plans alternative media strategy"
Michael Shields, MediaPost.com, October 22, 2004 | | | "Opinion from the end Times"
Knute Berger, Seattle Weekly, October 20, 2004 | | | "Wimblehack: Round 3"
Matt Taibbi, New York Press, October 22, 2004 | | | "Can't cover the bulge"
Brooke Gladstone, On the Media, October 15, 2004 | | | "Hello, Columbus: 'Dispatch' endorsement could make all the difference"
Joe Strupp, Editor & Publisher, October 20, 2004 | | | "Are you positive?"
Michael Roberts, Westword (Denver, Colo.), October 21, 2004 | | | "N.Y. landmark to get new look Election Night"
David Bauder, Associated Press, October 21, 2004 | | | "The only media choice for president"
John Sugg, Creative Loafing (Atlanta), October 21, 2004 | | | "TV's campaign focus is issues, think tank says"
Associated Press, October 20, 2004 | | | "Gasping through the stretch run"
Howard Kurtz, The Washington Post, October 19, 2004 | | | "Bush declines BET interview"
Michele Greppi, TV Week, October 19, 2004 | | | "Talking point"
Ta-Nehisi Coates, The Village Voice, October 19, 2004 | | | "Some Kerry spots never make the air"
Howard Kurtz, The Washington Post, October 20, 2004 | | | "Outraged pundits ignore Bush's lies"
Joe Conason, The New York Observer, October 20, 2004 | | | "Reporting lies gives them weight"
Edward Wasserman, Knight Ridder Newspapers, October 19, 2004 | | | "Newspaper's presidential indecision roils its readers"
Shannon Colavecchio-Van Sickler, St. Petersburg Times, October 19, 2004 | | | "Paper picks fail to sway voters"
Jennifer Harper, Washington Times, October 19, 2004 | | | "Daily endorsement tally: Kerry gains, but so does Bush"
Greg Mitchell, Editor & Publisher, October 19, 2004 | | | "Hear, hear, Mr. Gibson"
Michele Greppi, TV Week, October 18, 2004 | | | "Indicting the media"
David Corn, L.A. Weekly, October 15, 2004 | | | "'Balance' in a spinning world"
Howard Kurtz, The Washington Post, October 18, 2004 | | | "Candidates seize local media opportunities"
Liz Sidoti, Associated Press, October 18, 2004 | | | "Significant shifts of polls suggest media's failure"
David Shaw, The Los Angeles Times, October 18, 2004 | | | "Risks seen for TV chain showing film about Kerry"
Bill Carter, The New York Times, October 18, 2004 | | | "Kerry campaign wants equal time after film"
CNN.com, October 15, 2004 | October 9 through October 15 "Three lessons TV should take from the debates"
Kay McFadden, Seattle Times, October 15, 2004 | | | "Optimistic Bush dismisses 'pundits and spinners'"
G. Robert Hillman, The Dallas News, October 15, 2004 | | | "The media 'truth squad' and the presidential campaigns"
Alex Chadwick, "Day to Day" (NPR), October 15, 2004 | | | "We need different kinds of debates"
Jon Friedman, CBS MarketWatch, October 15, 2004 | | | "Fire in the belli"
Erik Wemple, Washington Citypaper, October 15, 2004 | | | "Customers hound Fox advertisers"
David Callendar, The Capital Times (Madison, Wis.), October 15, 2004 | | | "FCC chief says cannot block anti-Kerry show"
Reuters, October 15, 2004 | | | "Quick verdict on results of the most crucial debate"
Jim Rutenberg, The New York Times, October 14, 2004 | | | "Final debate judged a tie-- and 'wonkfest'"
Nick Anderson and Emma Schwartz, The Los Angeles Times, October 14, 2004 | | | "TV during the campaign: Occupied by politics, but also embroiled in it"
Frazier Moore, Associated Press, October 14, 2004 | | | "Broadcasting company that plans to air Kerry program unafraid to push owners' agenda"
Alex Dominguez, Associated Press, October 13, 2004 | | | "Both candidates need to come up with better answers"
Christopher Scanlan, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, October 13, 2004 | | | "TV networks seek debate bounce"
Jon Friedman, CBS MarketWatch, October 12, 2004 | | | "Fox News embraces ABC memo story over Cameron's pleas"
Joe Hagan, New York Observer, October 13, 2004 | | | "Cox, KPHO-TV 5 team to get viewer feedback on presidential debate"
Adam Kress, Business Journal of Phoenix, October 11, 2004 | | | "NBC, Telemundo stations partner on Latino vote special"
Daisy Whitney, TV Week, October 11, 2004 | | | "Moderate rock"
Ta-Nehisi Coates, The Village Voice, October 12, 2004 | | | | | "Are the media playing politics?"
Peter Johnson, USA Today, October 11, 2004 | | | "Networks vow caution in calling election"
Howard Kurtz, The Washington Post, October 12, 2004 | | | "Lessons from a long night"
Tom Brokaw, Newsweek, October 18, 2004 | | | "Conservative TV group to air anti-Kerry film"
Elizabeth Jensen, The Los Angeles Times, October 9, 2004 | | | "Sinclair's TV program on Kerry is called illegal donation to Bush"
David Folkenflik, The Baltimore Sun, October 12, 2004 | | | "Durbin vs. documentary"
Leon Lazaroff, John Cook, and Mark Silva, The Chicago Tribune, October 12, 2004 | | | "Family's TV clout in Bush's corner"
Howard Kurtz, The Washington Post, October 12, 2004 | | | "MTV mixes punk rock, pop and politics"
Tracy L. Scott, The Washington Post, October 10, 2004 | | | | October 2 through October 8 | | | "Bush's isolation from reporters could be a hindrance"
Mike Allen, The Washington Post, October 8, 2004 | | | "Raging bull"
Jack Shafer, Slate, October 7, 2004 | | | "The media shapes the call on who wins debates"
Paul Janensch, The Hartford Courant, October 7, 2004 | | | "O'Reilly hopes for interview with Kerry"
David Bauder, Associated Press, October 7, 2004 | | | | | "TV news sticks to the party line"
Matt Zoller Seitz, The Star-Ledger (Newark, N.J.), October 7, 2004 | | | "Quick draw"
Jack Shafer, Slate, October 6, 2004 | | | "The press sees a slugfest"
Howard Kurtz, The Washington Post, October 6, 2004 | | | "Wimblehack!"
Matt Taibbi, New York Press, October 6, 2004 | | | "'Hometown' paper cited by Cheney is a small one in Southern Pines"
Erin Olson, Editor & Publisher, October 6, 2004 | | | "Humor, info help candidates catch supporters in their Web"
Allison Connolly, The Virginian-Pilot, October 7, 2004 | | | | | "Spinning out clear winner even before debate begins"
Jim Rutenberg, The New York Times, October 6, 2004 | | | "Spin alley: a crowded place full of twists and turns"
Diane Suchetka, The Plain Dealer (Cleveland), October 6, 2004 | | | "Debate brings media buzz, political spin to campus"
Carl Chancellor, Akron Beacon Journal, October 6, 2004 | | | "Post-debate scorecard is what spin is all about"
Maeve Reston, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, October 6, 2004 | | | "U.S. media find no clear winner"
BBC News, October 6, 2004 | | | "Media mogul maelstrom"
Johnnie L. Roberts, Newsweek, October 4, 2004 | | | "When might turns right"
Nikki Finke, L.A. Weekly, October 1, 2004 | | | "War horse analysts come saddled with image of bias"
David Shaw, Los Angeles Times, October 3, 2004 | | | "Drawing conclusions about the presidential race"
Renee Montagne, NPR Morning Edition, September 30, 2004 | | | "How campaign 2004 has left the major networks behind"
Charlie McCollum, San Jose Mercury-News, October 4, 2004 | | | "Fox News apologizes for Kerry fabrication"
Oliver Burkeman, The Guardian (U.K.), October 4, 2004 | | | "Spin the battle"
Howard Kurtz, The Washington Post, October 2, 2004 | | | "How campaign 2004 has left the major networks behind"
Charlie McCollum, San Jose Mercury-News, October 4, 2004 | | | "Changing the story"
Tim Graham, National Review, October 1, 2004 | | | "Kerry supporters bombard reporters with positive spin"
Los Angeles Times, October 3, 2004 | | | "Democrats don't fool anyone in post-debate e-mail punditry"
Michael Tackett, Chicago Tribune, October 3, 2004 | | | "Ask. But don't tell."
Michael Kinsley, The Washington Post, October 3, 2004 | | September 25 through October 1 | | | "Candidates most telling when they aren't talking"
Alessandra Stanley, The New York Times, October 1, 2004 | | | "TV analysts give Kerry an early lead in quest for spin"
Nick Anderson and Emma Schwartz, The Los Angeles Times, October 1, 2004 | | | "TV coverage was just as predictable as debate"
Melanie McFarland, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, October 1, 2004 | | | "Press plays it (mainly) straight in first reports on Bush-Kerry debate"
Editor & Publisher, October 1, 2004 | | | "The miracle of post-debate commentary"
David Folkenflik, The Baltimore Sun, October 1, 2004 | | | "Public wins as debate rules ignored"
Tom Jicha, South Florida Sun-Sentinel, October 1, 2004 | | | "Moderator moves out of the spotlight"
Mark Memmott, USA Today, October 1, 2004 | | | "Spin doctors operate fast"
The Daily News (New York), October 1, 2004 | | | "Press 'fairness' in politics: just relativism disguised?"
Dante Chinni, The Christian Science Monitor, September 28, 2004 | | | | | "Candidate stands not delivered"
Brian Faler and Jonathan Finer, The Washingtno Post, September 30, 2004 | | | "TV says it won't stick to debate restrictions"
Mark Jurkowitz, The Boston Globe, September 30, 2004 | | | "The ultimate expectation"
Howard Kurtz, The Washington Post, September 29, 2004 | | | "Lehrer known as honest voice devoted to neutrality"
Johanna Neuman, The Los Angeles Times, September 30, 2004 | | | "The strategy beneath the flip-flop label"
David Greenberg, Los Angeles Times, September 29, 2004 | | | | | "Networks to ignore debate camera rules"
David Bauder, Associated Press, September 28, 2004 | | | "Swagger vs. substance"
Paul Krugman, The New York Times, September 28, 2004 | | | | | "How the Internet turned everyone into James Carville"
Farhad Manjoo, Salon, September 28, 2004 | | | "Did columnist get Kerry into pub to watch the Pack?"
Erin Olson, Editor & Publisher, September 27, 2004 | | | | | "Fear and laptops on the campaign trail"
Matthew Klam, The New York Times, September 26, 2004 | | | "The media, losing their way"
David S. Broder, The Washington Post, September 26, 2004 | | | "'L.A. Times' may break tradition, make choice for president"
Joe Strupp, Editor & Publisher, September 26, 2004 | | | "U.S. media: The great divide"
Richard Allen Greene, BBC News, September 27, 2004 | | | "The U.S. race in Arabic newspapers"
Peter C, Valenti, The New York Times, September 26, 2004 | | | | | "Just say the polls aren't clear"
Mark Mellman, The Hill, September 22, 2004 | | | "Debates: Desperately seeking Stewart"
Jon Friedman, CBS Marketwatch.com, September 24, 2004 | | | "We have met the news, and it is us"
Clyde Haberman, The New York Times, September 24, 2004 | | | "Watergate reporter critical of journalism, politics"
Sebastian Kitchen, Montgomery Advertiser, September 22, 2004 | | | | September 18 through September 24 | "Just say the polls aren't clear"
Mark Mellman, The Hill, September 22, 2004 | | | "Debates: Desperately seeking Stewart"
Jon Friedman, CBS Marketwatch.com, September 24, 2004 | | | "We have met the news, and it is us"
Clyde Haberman, The New York Times, September 24, 2004 | | | "Watergate reporter critical of journalism, politics"
Sebastian Kitchen, Montgomery Advertiser, September 22, 2004 | | | | | "Kerry camp rejects CBS link"
Stephen Dinan and Bill Sammon, The Washington Times, September 22, 2004 | | | "White House links memos, Kerry effort"
Howard Kurtz, The Washington Post, September 22, 2004 | | | "Vexed, lies & videotape: Kerry blames GOP on CBS ploy"
Andrew Miga, The Boston Herald, September 22, 2004 | | | "CBS says producer violated policy"
Jim Rutenberg and Bill Carter, The New York Times, September 22, 2004 | | | | | "CBS to say it was misled on Bush guard memos"
Howard Kurtz, The Washington Post, September 20, 2004 | | | "Bush says questions about Guard memos used by CBS 'need to be answered'"
Jim Rutenberg, The New York Times, September 19, 2004 | | | "After blogs got hits, CBS got a black eye"
Howard Kurtz, The Washington Post, September 20, 2004 | | | "In rush to air, CBS quashed memo worries"
Howard Kurtz, Michael Dobbs, and James V. Grimaldi, The Washington Post, September 19, 2004 | | | "CBS News concludes it was misled on National Guard memos, network says"
Jim Rutenberg, The New York Times, September 20, 2004 | | | "Desperately seeking Dick Cheney"
Rick Lyman, The New York Times, September 19, 2004 | | | "Questions we'll wish we'd asked"
David S. Broder, The Washington Post, September 19, 2004 | | | | September 11 through September 17 | "Lather over Rather"
Deborah Orin and Ian Bishop, The New York Post, September 17, 2004 | | | "Familiar roles for Rather and his critics"
Jim Rutenberg, The New York Times, September 17, 2004 | | | "In Abilene, folks not whipped up over fishy faxes"
John Kass, The Chicago Tribune, September 17, 2004 | | | "For media on campaign trail, little access to candidates"
Paul Farhi, The Washington Post, September 16, 2004 | | | "Finding truth on the Internet"
Louise Witt, Wired, September 16, 2004 | | | "House GOP turns on Rather"
Hans Nichols, The Hill, September 16, 2004 | | | "Call in Congress"
Hugh Hewitt, The Weekly Standard, September 16, 2004 | | | "Media went afoul in coverage of Kelley, CBS documents"
Paul Janensch, The Hartford Courant, September 16, 2004 | | | "Stribulations"
Mike Mosedale, The City Pages (Minneapolis, Minn.), September 15, 2004 | | | "Kitty Kelley, derided and delicious"
Tina Brown, The Washington Post, September 16, 2004 | | | "Checks and balances"
Michael Roberts, Westword, September 16, 2004 | | | "Dan Rather to Bush: 'Answer the questions'"
Joe Hagan, The New York Observer, September 15, 2004 | | | "Watching the media watchdogs"
Jonathan V. Last, The Weekly Standard, September 14, 2004 | | | "War over war records: a losing battle"
Ron Elving, NPR, September 13, 2004 | | | "You call that news? I don't"
Bryan Keefer, Spinsanity, September 12, 2004 | | | | | "From biased to partisan"
Stanley Kurtz, National Review, September 13, 2004 | | | | | "Old news, long overdo"
Howard Kurtz, The Washington Post, September 13, 2004 | | | "Amid criticism, CBS stands by its reports"
Mark Memmott, USA Today, September 13, 2004 | | | "CBS, Rather stand firm on Bush story as furor swells"
David Folkenflik, The Baltimore Sun, September 11, 2004 | | | "Those discredited memos"
William Safire, The New York Times, September 13, 2004 | | | "Playing to the media in attacks on service"
Tom Oliphant, The Boston Globe, September 12, 2004 | | | "TV analysts' double duty-- doesn't anyone care?"
Ed Bark, Dallas Morning News, September 10, 2004 | | | "CNN--crossing the line with Carville and Begala?"
Harry Jaffe, Washingtonian, September 10, 2004 | | September 4 to September 10 | "Some question authenticity of papers on Bush"
Michael Dobbs and Mike Allen, The Washington Post, September 10, 2004 | | | "G.O.P. riled by 2 CNN hosts"
Jim Rutenberg, The New York Times, September 10, 2004 | | | "News that surfaces outside the mainstream"
Liz Halloran, Hartford Courant, September 9, 2004 | | | | | "'Globe' reporter explains timing of latest Bush probe"
Joe Strupp, Editor & Publisher, September 9, 2004 | | | "Campaign coverage needs to read between the lines"
David Shaw, The Los Angeles Times, September 5, 2004 | | | "Burned by the spotlight"
Jane Hall, Columbia Journalism Review, September/October 2004 | | | "Media bias against Republicans goes beyond the pale"
Tim Chavez, The Tennessean, September 8, 2004 | | | | | "Media view Kitty Kelley's Bush book with caution"
Howard Kurtz, The Washington Post, September 8, 2004 | | | "GOP convention viewers tuned in to Fox News"
David Folkenflik, The Baltimore Sun, September 8, 2004 | | | "Will newspapers (finally) get fair share of campaign advertising?"
Jennifer Saba, Editor & Publisher, September 8, 2004 | | | "The daily grind"
Ta-Nehisi Coates, The Village Voice, September 8, 2004 | | | | | "Moore's spin spotlights revolving doors"
Howard Kurtz, The Washington Post, September 6, 2004 | | | "GOP week winner for Fox"
Caroline Wilbert, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, September 3, 2004 | | | "NYC sees to it that journalists have good time"
David Folkenflik, The Baltimore Sun, September 5, 2004 | | | "Is that what he really said?"
Michael Getler, The Washington Post, September 5, 2004 | | | "The Fox convention"
Brendan Bernhard, L.A. Weekly, September 3, 2004 | | | "Media missed the boat on the swift ads issue"
Paul Janensch, Hartford Courant, September 2, 2004 |
|
Powered by: Phase2 Technology
